It feels good to draw again.

@1 day ago
#art problems 

I bought new lipstick. I kept hearing all these good things about it being a nude for brown girls but it’s a little lighter than I thought it’d be.

@1 week ago
#i bought new lipstick #beautiful fairy princess problems 

There is nothing worse than going into a stranger’s bathroom for the first time and suddenly having to take a massive shit.

@2 weeks ago
#every day is tmi Tuesday 

Read More

@3 weeks ago









describe your aesthetic in four words go





Queer Thrift Trash Raccoon

Prissy radioactive dinosaur princess

goth thrift witch deity

lazy goth femme thot

Post-earthy thrift drama teacher

Minimalist 2000s Swamp Witch

@4 weeks ago with 15251 notes



while this is mostly about facts, there are a lot of opinions in this tutorial (namely my distrust on several brands marketing strategies, and my opinion that’s better to start with cheap student quality stuff. LOTS of people disagree on that point) as well that you should take as what they are: personal opinions.

here is slightly more readable than on tumblr

this is the result of several years of research on creating a cheap but high quality palette that would help me.

other things to be aware of: pigments are generally more resistant in oil and acrylics than they are in watercolor. but there are a couple of pigments that work well in watercolor but really badly in oil.

pigments through the ages
a comprehensive guide to watercolor pigments and a lot of tests on popular brands
about van gogh’s bedroom
Blue and Yellow don’t make green by Michael Wilcox

Everything that i’ve been meaning to do watercolor tutorials about. GREAT NOW I DON’T HAVE TO. 8D

@1 month ago with 12598 notes

Read More

@1 month ago

please reblog this if you’re still really sad that bend it like beckham wasn’t a lesbian movie


i’m going to screenshot this and show it to the person who holds the rights to the movie and make them do something about it

(via swampmermaids)

@1 month ago with 471 notes












Isn’t it nice how people twist their religious scripture to suit their weds but when it’s used against them it’s suddenly not okay

I talked to a monk about this quote once (we have mutual friends, and he came to a New Year’s Eve party at my shared art studio). He said this isn’t even talking about homosexuality. That the bible never actually says homosexuality is wrong. What that passage means is this:

Women were treated as subservient and it that you shouldn’t treat other men as subservient, like they are beneath you. It is not talking about homosexuality. If it was, it would say it outright since the bible lists other things outright.

I take the word of a monk who have studied the bible extensively more than a self proclaimed Christian.

The above text, I would like to point out is from the point of view of this translation of the original Hebrew. I spoke with my cousin’s rabbi on the matter and his response was different, saying that it was a mistranslation. See, the true translation says that a man shall not lie with another in the bed of a woman, which is to say, the Hebrews had a shit ton of rules about when a man was or was not allowed in a woman’s bed and private quarters (including, if she didn’t want you there, you weren’t allowed there. Hebrew women were also allowed to divorce their husbands and the image of the ‘oppressive Hebrew people’ is an image that was propogated by Christianity which, historically speaking, doesn’t treat the Jewish people too well and liked to paint them as being rather barbaric and backwards and cultish with their traditions, which, another piece of fun info, their traditions were one of the main reasons why the Jewish people were less likely, in medieval times, to die of the plague. Because washing your hands and avoiding the dead and vermin and the like was a lot of help. Of course the Christians persecuted them for not dying but that’s another matter. I’m sidetracked). So the verse is literally saying ‘Don’t fuck in some lady’s bed because that’s just goddamn rude’

Also, whenever a Christian brings the book of Leviticus up, you should feel free to point out that these are rules that were given to make the Hebrew people prepared for when the son of God came to earth. In Christianity, it’s believed the son of God was Jesus. So by following the rules set in Leviticus or pushing them as things we should follow, they’re saying that Jesus was not the son of God, and that Jesus did not, in fact, die for our sins. Jewish people believe, in their faith, that the son of God hasn’t yet been born, so many choose to follow these rules.

Most people of course roll their eyes when I explain the translation of the verse (full breakdown found here) but it’s always fun to point out the nature of the rules in Leviticus and the implications of following them. 

I’m a theology student and I am on the verge of crying because of how accurate this commentary is. Historical context is simultaneously the most interesting and most important part of interpreting any texts. 

Most religious people seem to base their beliefs on things that are severely mistranslated. I wish they would do their research before using the bible for hate.

I studied theology extensively and was going to become a theologist until I switched majors. The above commentary is 100% accurate and what I try to stress in a lot if conversations with Bible Thumpers.

Jesus also affirms the homosexual relationship between the Roman Centurion and his “slave”. The particular Greek word used to refer to this special slave was “pais”. Greek language studies and contexts show that a “pais” was a male love slave. Regular slaves were called “dolos”. The Centurion makes this distinction clearly when he asks Jesus to heal his slave (pais), and then to prove his status he tells Jesus that his slaves (dolos) go when he tells them to. But this slave (pais) was special. He was the Centurion’s lover.

Hearing this, Jesus was so amazed he says he had not found ANYONE ELSE who had such great faith. He then blesses the Centurion and heals his male lover.

Matthew 8:5-13


In short, the English adaptation is a mistranslated farce.


reblogging for the comments ^^^^^^

Saving for later, in case parents ever bring this up or I need to come out again and “for good”.

Reblogging for the history most people want to ignore.


(Source: idiotsonfb, via belleandwhistle)

@6 days ago with 491578 notes

Infographic: 7 Reasons This Is An Excellent Resume For Someone With No Experience
@1 week ago with 78079 notes

That weird moment when you see a black character and you’re relieved that they actually look like a black person and not a weird racist caricature or a plainface colored brown.

@2 weeks ago with 12 notes
#BLACK GIRL PROBLEMS #it's so weird reading manga sometimes #and i mean characters that are actually explicitly black #not just ambiguously darkskinned 

Can…can we stop making up words to describe common feelings and experiences now? I understand that you might feel alone or something (trying not to say “special”) but what you’re describing is not a novel concept.

@3 weeks ago

Read More

@1 month ago with 1 note

aaaaggghhh I forgot to shave before I left so now I’m in the bathroom at work trying to pluck out the hairs with my fingers

@1 month ago
#body things #ugh #hirsute problems 

Read More

@1 month ago